In recent times, there has been a growing and intense debate on migration to Europe, particularly following Germany’s approval of legislation aimed at facilitating the deportation of individuals whose asylum requests have been denied.
This move is part of Germany’s broader commitment to tightening its migration policy, potentially leading to the repatriation of numerous Nigerians living in Germany.
Despite the firm stance of German authorities, many Nigerians still harbor aspirations of living in Europe, viewing it as an escape from the considerable challenges they face in Nigeria. The sentiment of one individual in Abuja’s Area 10 Market captures this perspective, stating,
- “If I have the opportunity to go legally for greener pastures, that’s better for me, as the hardship here is seriously challenging.”
Conversely, some local Nigerians express reservations about leaving their homeland, emphasizing the importance of building and developing Nigeria rather than abandoning it. Concerns are raised about the potential consequences of a mass exodus and the impact it could have on the nation’s identity.
The desire of many Nigerians to relocate to Germany is rooted in the complex socio-political landscape of Nigeria. The country, Africa’s most populous and one of West Africa’s stable democracies, grapples with issues such as corruption, unemployment, and the ongoing conflict with Islamist militants in the northeast, displacing millions since 2009.
Between January and September of the current year, over 1,800 first-time asylum requests were submitted by Nigerians to German authorities. Judith Ibi, a Nigerian lawyer, attributes this trend to the pursuit of better job prospects, higher wages, and improved living standards in Germany.
She criticizes the Nigerian government for failing to fulfill its responsibilities, claiming that social policies outlined in the country’s constitution should ease citizens’ lives, but the government’s shortcomings hinder this.
During a visit to Nigeria in October, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz advocated for a closer partnership between the two nations to manage migration. This included expanding migration centers to support returnees and the repatriation of rejected asylum seekers.
Nigerian President Bola Tinubu expressed openness to accepting the return of migrants, emphasizing the need for careful preparation and investment on both sides.
However, the challenge arises in verifying the identity of migrants, a critical aspect of the repatriation process. Of nearly 14,000 asylum seekers from Nigeria obligated to leave Germany, around 12,500 remain due to the absence of identity papers.
Despite this, some support Germany’s move to repatriate those without the right to stay, citing the potential strain on the German economy and state caused by illegal migrants.
While Germany aims to intensify the deportation of rejected asylum seekers, it also seeks to attract more skilled foreign workers to address labor market gaps. The recent immigration law reform in Germany encourages individuals from outside the European Union to come for work, highlighting the need for a balanced approach.
Henrik Maihack, head of the Africa department at the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, emphasizes the long-term strategic objective of attracting skilled migrants to Europe to ensure economic prosperity. He suggests that focusing on repatriation may not be as crucial as preparing for the demographic challenges Europe will face by 2050.
Despite these considerations, the German government faces significant pressure from opposition parties critical of its immigration control measures. The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party’s anti-immigration stance has influenced political decisions.
However, questions remain about the destination and security conditions for deported individuals, urging policymakers to carefully evaluate the implications of their decisions.
In conclusion, the evolving dynamics between Germany and Nigeria in the realm of migration underscore the complexities surrounding identity, economic considerations, and the broader challenges faced by both nations. The push for a more strategic and comprehensive approach to migration reflects the intricate interplay between national interests and global demographic trends.
For any enquiries please, email our editorial team at [email protected]. If you liked this story, kindly sign up for Clariform Newsletter, a handpicked selection of stories that helps you clarify things that matter and gives you clear signals about your world, delivered directly to your inbox.
Please subscribe to our YouTube channel, and join thousands of Clariform on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
